Restoration Thinking


I love the study of restoration theology.  I am a child of the “Restoration Movement” from the 18th-19th centuries, which has given birth to what most folks in the modern day know as Disciples of Christ/Christian Churches/Churches of Christ.  Although this was NOT the intent, it is what has happened in history.  While I cherish my heritage, I have come to believe that in general this background is sectarian and as denominational as any other tradition in the Christian faith.  Through the years of study and reading, I’ve come to a decent understanding of the motives for “restoring the New Testament church” as it was termed.  I’m not foolish enough to think it was completely restored – after all, how could it be if we had 1800 years separating us, regional customs, one-sided letters of instruction (the epistles of Paul to churches or individuals – which would have looked something like the picture to the right), and the charismata present during the early days of the church (the Spirit’s miraculous abilities)?

It’s interesting.  The thinking of most of these men became clearly in line with the idea of the church being an inantimate object, something intangible that lies in the character of the disciples of Jesus.   AS IN the New Testament, there was no title of this people, they became known as “disciples” first, then later “Christians”, then as a collective body “the Way”, but never the titles listed above.  In case you’ve not done a whole lot of reading for yourself about the history, it would be wise to start!  One of the best resources to do this study is the website maintained by Hans Rollman, of the University of Newfoundland.  (http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/restmov.html)  He documents some of the massive body of writings by the movers and shakers who came out of that era; men like Thomas and Alexander Campbell, Barton Stone, Robert Richardson, David Lipscomb, and many, many others.

I am part of a body in Franklin, TN that seems to be as Biblical and true to that Restoration spirit that I’ve ever seen.  While we have a ways to go in many areas, the concept of the “Lord’s church” and ownership only by him seems natural.  The Supper is the central focus of the assembly, and praise, prayer, and teaching takes place at each occasion.  TRUE non-denominationalism is hard to find.  It is more of a concept, or a mindset than anything, and many in our day are more open to it now than ever, because of the post-modern world or relativity that we live in.  The early church was a dynamic body of people who truly loved one another.  They were not a commune, but most likely seemed like it.  They took part in each other’s lives to a point where unity, fellowship, and daily accountability were central to their being.  —  This way of thinking is foreign to many people in the fellowship I grew up in.  It is familiar to many of them as well!  The difficult thing is to cast aside tradition and cling to the things that are true.  I’m sure it was hard for Scottish Presbyterians in 1800 (Thomas and Alex. Campbell) and men from every other sectarian background of the Reformation time.  I will most likely start writing about some of the men – and their thinking – that I most admire from the history of the Lord’s church.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Restoration Thinking

  1. Great post. I went to the site and read some bio’s and other things, very interesting. I wonder why this history is not taught or at least studied more in our groups? For someone who has never studied on the restoration, where would you suggest to start?

  2. Ahh, the RM. One of my favorite topics of study. The website you mentioned, is bookmarked in my favorites, love it. I especially find Robert Richardson’s writings regarding the Holy Spirit very enlightning. His writings recounting the progression of the RM are equally as eye opening.

    I agree with Dougp243 (scarey I know) that the RM should be studied, lending to our knowledge of how we have come to our present state. I also agree with your assessment of the body in Franklin with which you worship. I too, for way to long was taught to run from Hell, instead of running toward Heaven. The body in Franklin, with it’s faith and & conviction to truely seek God, is moving toward a closer spiritual relationship to our Lord, and each other.

    Let us take into account that we are all spiritual beings, living in a fallen world. By truely seeking God and growing in the Word, understanding and knowledge of the Way is brought forth….. God is in charge, and one’s all must be surrendered to Him. By being part of a body of true God seekers our daily walk becomes easier. We come to the realization that we aren’t working for this world, but for the Kingdom.
    See ‘ya Sunday!

  3. Thanks for the link Drew. I’ve been going to Holmes Road since I moved to Memphis in 99. Since then I’ve hear alot about the Restoration Movement but never really delved into it. Hopefully this will give me a good start. Based upon what I do know about the origins of the Churches of Christ though I’ve always found it a bit odd that a movement with the goal of being non-denominational seems to have become one (at least in some cases. Very good and thought provoking post as usual.

  4. Thx guys. It has yielded great rewards to me in personal study. Although it’s ironic that so much irony takes place (huh?) in our tradition. Daryl’s comment is so true; the groups who started to be non-denominational are often becoming the most deeply sectarian there can be. Not all of them, praise the Lord! THUS the appeal to me… be a N.T. Disciple of Christ, not a CoC’er or something less.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s